一起答
单选

Unix与Linux的主要区别是:(27)。

  • A.Unix是用C语言写的,而Linux是用汇编语言写的
  • B.Linux  Unix的内核程序不相同
  • C.Unix主要是运行在微机上的,而Linux主要是运行在小型机上的
  • D.Linux  Unix的用户界面完全不同
参考答案
查看试卷详情
相关试题
  1. (77)

    • A.moderns
    • B.cats
    • C.modems
    • D.modulates
  2. (76)

    • A.permanent components
    • B.peripheral components
    • C.particular components
    • D.precise components
  3. (78)

    • A.person computers
    • B.personal counting
    • C.person circumstance
    • D.personal computers
  4. (75)

    • A.mouse
    • B.software
    • C.drives
    • D.hardware
  5. Tile hardware are the parts of computer itself including the(71)(CPU)and related microchips and micro -circuitry, keyboards, monitors, case and(72)(including floppy, hard, CD, DVD, optical, tape, etc...). Other extra parts called(73)or devices include mouse, printers,(74), scanners, digital cameras and cards(sound, colour, video)etc... Together they are often referred to as a(75)or PCs.

    • A.Central Processing Unit
    • B.Center Process Unit
    • C.Central Processing Unix
    • D.Counting Process Unit
  6. (72)

    • A.compiled
    • B.translated
    • C.accumulated
    • D.gathered
  7. (73)

    • A.efficient program
    • B.executable program
    • C.executable words
    • D.performable words
  8. (71)

    • A.site
    • B.place
    • C.space
    • D.dimension
  9. (70)

    • A.done
    • B.taken
    • C.built
    • D.programmed
  10. C is sometimes referred to as a 'high -level(66)language'. Some people think that's an insult, but it's actually a deliberate and significant aspect of the language. If you have(67)in assembly language, youll probably find C very natural and comfortable(although if you continue to focus too heavily on machine - level details, youll probably end up with unnecessarily non- portable programs). If you havent programmed in assembly language, you may be frustrated by C 's lack of certain higher - level features. In either case, you should understand why C was de- signed this way: so that seemingly - simple constructions expressed in C would not expand to arbitrarily expensive( in time or(68))machine language constructions when(69). If you write a C program simply and succinctly, it is likely to result in a succinct, efficient machine language executable. If you find that the(70)resulting from a C program is not efficient, it's probably because of something silly you did, not because of something the compiler did behind your back which you have no control over. In any case, there's no point in complaining about C's low - level flavor: C is what it is.

    • A.assembly
    • B.combination
    • C.grouping
    • D.compounding