根据以下资料，回答下列各题：

Being good-looking is useful in so many ways．In addition to whatever personal pleasure it gives you，being attractive also helps you earn more money，find a higher—earning spouse and get better deals on mortgages．Each of these facts has been demonstrated over the past 20 years by many economists and other researchers．The effects are not small：one study showed that an American worker who was among the bottom one—seventh in looks，as assessed by randomly chosen observers，earned lo t0 15 percent less per year than a similar worker whose looks were assessed in the top one—third—a lifetime difference，in a typical case，of about$230，000．

Most of us．regardless of our professed attitudes，prefer as customers to buy from better-looking salespeople，as jurors to listen to better-looking attorneys，as voters to be led by better-looking politicians.as students to learn from better-looking professors．This is not amatter of evil employers’refusing to hire the ugly：in our roles as workers，customers and potential lovers we are all responsible for these effects．

How could we remedy this injustice?A radical solution may be needed：why not offer legal protections to the ugly，as we do with racial，ethnic and religious minorities，women and handicapped individuals?We actually already do offer such protections in a few places，including in some jurisdictions in California，and in the District of Columbia，where discriminatory treatment based on looks in hiring，promotions，housing and other areas is Drohibited．The mechanics of legislating this kind of protection are not as difficult as you might think．Ugliness could be protected generally in the United States by small extensions of the Americans With Disabilities Act．Ugly people could be allowed to seek help from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other agencies in overcoming the effects of discrimination．

You might argue that people can’t be classified by their looks——that beauty is in the eye of the beholder．In one study，more than half of a group of people were assessed identically by each of two observers using a five．point scale；and very few assessments differed by more than one point．

There are possible other oNections．“Ugliness”is not a personal trait that many people choose to embrace；those whom we classify as protected might not be willing to admit that they are ugly．But with the chance of obtaining extra pay and promotions amounting to $230．000 in lost lifetime earnings．there’s a large enough incentive to do S0．Bringing anti—discrimination lawsuits is also costly，and few potential plaintiffs could afford to do so．But many attorneys would be willing to organize classes of plaintiffs to overcome these costs，just as they now do in racial．discrimination and other lawsuits．

Economic arguments for protecting the ugly are as strong as those for protecting some groupscurrently covered by legislation．So why not go ahead and expand protection to the looks—challenged?There’s one legitimate concern．with increasingly tight limits on government resources，expanding rights to yet another protected group would reduce protection for groups that have commanded Our legislative and other attention for over 50 years．You might reasonably disagree and argue for protecting all deserving groups．Either way，you shouldn’t be surprised to see theUnited States heading toward this new legal frontier．

The main idea of the first paragraph is that_______．

_______

_______

_______

_______

根据以下资料，回答下列各题：

Spain’s government is now championing a cause called“right to be forgotten”．(46)It has ordered Google to stop indexing information about 90 citizenswhofi led for malcom plaints with its Data Protection the Agency．All 90 people wanted information deleted from the Web． Among them was a victim of domestic violence who discovered that her address could easily be found through Google．Another，well into middle age now，thought it was unfair that a few computer key strokes could unearth an account of her arrest in her college days．

(47)-They might not-have received much of a hearing in the United States，where Google一 is based and where courts have consistently found that the right to publish the truth about someones past supersede sany right to privacy．But here，as elsewhere in Europe，an idea has taken hold--individuals should have a“right to be forgotten”on the Web．

(48)In fact,the phrase "right to be forgotten" is being usedt0coverabatchofissues,ranging from those in the Spanish case to the behavior. of companies seeking to．Make money from privat einfor mation that can becolle ctedoil the Web.

(49)Spains Data Protection Agency believes that searchengines havealteredtheprocess by which most data ends up for gotten and there for eadjustments need to be made．The deputy dlrector of the agency，Jesfis Rubi，pointed to the official government gazette(公报)，which used to publish every weekday，including bankruptcy auctions，official pardons．And who passed the civil service exams．Usually 220 pages of fine print．it quickly ended up gathering dust on various backroom shelves．The information was still there．but not easily accessible .Then two years ago，the 350 yearold publication went online．making it possible for embarrassing information--no matter how oldto be obtained easily．

The publisher of the government publication， Fernando P6rez， said it was meant to foster transparency．Lists of scholarship winners，for instance，make it hard for the government officials to steer all the money to their own children．“But maybe．”he said,“there is information that has a life cycle and only has value for a certain time."

Many Europeans are broadly uncomfortable with the way personal information is found by search engines and used for commerce．When ads pop up on one’S screen．clearly linked to Subjects that are of interest to him，one may find it Orwellian．A recent poll conducted by the European Union found that most Europeans agree．Three out of four said they were worried about how Internet companies used their information and wanted the right to delete personal data at any time．Ninety percent wanted the European Union to take action on the right to be forgotten．

(50)Experts say that Google and other search engines see some of these court cases as an assault on a principle of law already established--that search engines are essentially not responsible for the information they corral from the Web．And hope the Spanish court agrees．The companies believe if there are orivacy issues，the complainants should address those who posted the material on the Web．But some experts in Europe believe that search engines should probably be reined in．“They are the ones that are spreading the word．Without them 110 0ne would find these things．”

_______

Directions：

Write an essay of l60—200 words based on the following drawing．In your essay，

you should

1)describe the drawing briefly，

2)explain its intended meaning，and then

3)give your comments．

You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET．(20 points)

______

Directions：

Suppose that you are an English major and one of your classmates wants to choose a book to learn English letter writing．Write a letter in about l00 words to make a suggestion to him／her．

1) Give your suggestions，and explain the reasons．

2)Other recommendation．

You should write about 100 words on ANSWER SHEET 2．Write it neatly on the ANSWER SHEET．

Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter．Use“Zhang Wei”instead．

Do not write your address．(10 points)

根据以下资料，回答下列各题：

Directions：

In the following text，some sentences have been removed．For Questions 41—45．choose the most suitable one from the list A．G to fit into each of the numbered blanks.There are two extra choices，which do not fit in any of the blanks．Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET．(10 points)

______